Special report: Venezuela
More American adventurism for energy dominance
Articles
The shameful history of U.S. military invasions in Latin America
Video: The Panama Deception documentary
Key stats
Proved reserves: ~303 Bbbl (No. 1 globally). eia.gov
2023 crude production: ~742 kb/d; production down ~70% since 2013. eia.gov
Refinery throughput: <300 kb/d (≈20% of nameplate). eia.gov
Export chokepoint: Puerto José ≈90% of crude exports pre-2019. eia.gov
2023 crude export destination: China ~69%. eia.gov
Venezuela geography and energy infrastructure
The chatter about a U.S. move on Venezuela is intensifying—carrier groups and destroyers operating in the Caribbean, covert activity reported, and “narco-trafficking” framed as the casus belli. But despite the noise, Washington has publicly said it is not currently considering strikes inside Venezuela, even as deployments and secrecy around a Latin America mission raise escalation risk. In short: the capability is present; the intent remains ambiguous.
Data source: Global Oil Infrastructure Tracker, Global Energy Monitor, May 2023; Global Gas Infrastructure Tracker, Global Energy Monitor, December 2023; and Oil & Gas Journal, 2022 Worldwide Refining Survey
The Prize
Why does Venezuela matter if shooting starts? Simple - oil. The country sits on the world’s largest proven reserves, roughly 303 billion barrels, about 17% of global supply, most of it buried in the heavy crude of the Orinoco Belt. But production is a shadow of its former self - around 742,000 barrels per day in 2023, down nearly 70% from a decade ago. Refining is crippled, running at less than 300,000 barrels a day, barely one-fifth of capacity. Exports limp along through diluent swaps and a few working terminals, mainly Puerto José, which once handled nine out of every ten barrels shipped before sanctions hit in 2019. Nearly 70% of those barrels now head to China, often under oil-for-loans deals that keep Caracas afloat but leave little real cash flow.
Recent U.S. policy has oscillated between sanctions pressure and narrow licensing to manage market impacts. Licences that once allowed Chevron to export Venezuelan crude were wound down and then partially restored in constrained form; separate U.S. tariffs and tighter measures depressed liftings earlier this year. The through-line: leverage energy flows without overtly boosting Maduro’s cash box—an approach that can be dialled up or down quickly around any military signalling.
A limited strike or maritime/air interdiction under a “drug war” banner is easier to justify than an invasion. Caracas is primed to frame even constrained action as imperial adventurism. The strategic prize-securing, stabilizing, or influencing access to the Orinoco’s vast, high-cost barrels.
If things turn hot
Disrupt exports-shipments from key ports like Puerto José could stall, lifting freight rates and insurance costs.
Tighten supply - with Venezuelan barrels offline, heavy-sour grades in the Atlantic Basin would spike in value.
Push prices higher -refiners in the U.S. Gulf and Europe would scramble for replacement crude.
Increase volatility -traders would bid up risk premiums across the curve, especially nearby spreads.
Fuel a flight to safety -dollar strength and gold demand would likely rise in the short term.
Notes
Reuters reported Friday 31st Oct 2025-that the White House says it is not planning strikes inside Venezuela. Treat invasion chatter as a tail-risk scenario with real market impact via logistics and insurance, even absent a ground campaign.
For more, find me at The Oil Report on substack.